By definition, fraud means misrepresentation of a material fact or concealment of a significant defect. Fraud also includes a falsified appraisal by an expert but does not include a non-expert’s opinion. Examples of fraud include the rollback of an automobile’s odometer prior to sale or an altered appraisal of a diamond ring. On the other hand, if you are looking to buy a 1965 Mustang and the owner tells you that he predicts its value will double within five years, this does not constitute fraud.
To prevail in a suit to have a contract set aside on account of fraud, the plaintiff must prove three things:
1. There was intent to mislead. The term that reappears often in this business law course and on the IQEX Exam is “scienter” which a Latin word denoting intent to mislead is and or reckless disregard for the truth.
2. Reasonable reliance by the plaintiff (i.e. the injured party).
3. Injury resulted (in a financial sense).
Fraud may occur in the inducement to enter into a contract during negotiations or in the execution of the contract. An example of the former is a representation that a car has only been driven 10,000 km whereas the actual distance is 50,000. An example of the latter is a lawyer representing to a client that the client is signing a will, while, in reality, the document is a promissory note in favour of the lawyer.
Remedies for fraud include rescission (voiding) the contract or a reduction in compensation (e.g. a price reduction to compensate for the inaccuracy of a car’s odometer).
Innocent misrepresentation may give rise to the same resolution, but damages would not likely be awarded.
0 of 1 Questions completed Questions: You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading… You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz. You must first complete the following:
0 of 1 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0) Click “VIEW QUESTIONS” button to review the answers Section 1 Q 13 Which of the following, if intentionally misstated by a seller to a buyer, would be considered a fraudulent inducement to make a contract?
Quiz Summary
Information
Results
Results
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Categories
1. Question
Duress means threats of violence or extreme pressure against a party or a family member. It may involve social or economic coercion. Extreme duress causes an agreement to be void while ordinary duress creates a voidable agreement.
Undue influence occurs when a dominant person (parent, employer, advisor) persuades a weaker person to enter into a contract to the latter’s detriment.
A good example is a situation where an individual is hired to work in a remote area and is required to sign a lease for company housing. If the individual quits or is fired, he or she would probably use the undue influence argument to void the lease.
Note that option b refers to a term that does not appear in these notes. Generally, this means you can reject it as a choice.
0 of 1 Questions completed Questions: You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading… You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz. You must first complete the following:
0 of 1 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0) Click “VIEW QUESTIONS” button to review the answers Section 1 Q 14 lf a person is induced to enter into a contract by person because of the close relationship between the parties, the contract may be voidable under which of the following defenses?
Quiz Summary
Information
Results
Results
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Categories
1. Question
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |