The Parol Evidence Rule answers the question whether or not a written contract can be amended orally at a later time.
The first point is that a written contract intended by the parties to be final and complete may not be contradicted by previous or contemporaneous written or oral evidence. In other words, one may not introduce as evidence prior drafts or discussions right up until an agreement is reached.
However, subsequent changes may be made by the parties to amend a prior written agreement. For example, you can enter into a written consulting agreement to render 20 hours a month of services. Later on, you can orally amend the agreement to increase or decrease the time spent.
In “real life”, if a dispute occurs, it may be difficult to prove that there was agreement with respect to the modifications.
Note that previous evidence can be used to prove fraud, mistake or duress.
Please answer the questions below and review your answers.
Question 20 illustrates the workings of The Parol Evidence Rule. Review the model solution carefully if you gave a wrong answer. Question 21 illustrates a common form of IQEX multiple choice question. It is basically a modified true/false question. First work with one of the columns. If you are sure the answer is, for example, “yes”, you can eliminate two of the four choices. Then look at the other column. In a worst case, you may have to guess between the two remaining choices.
By now you should begin to understand why I made the comment in my course introduction that questions tend to be repeated from year to year. The concepts don’t change, so there really is no need to re-invent the wheel by creating new questions to determine whether candidates know their material.
Time limit: 0
Quiz Summary
0 of 1 Questions completed
Questions:
Information
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Click “VIEW QUESTIONS” button to review the answers
1
Current
Review
Answered
Correct
Incorrect
Question 1 of 1
1. Question
Section 1 Q 20
Rogers and Lennon entered into a written computer consulting agreement that required Lennon to provide certain weekly reports to Rogers. The agreement also stated that Lennon would provide the computer equipment necessary to perform the services, and that Rogers’ computer would not be used. As the parties were executing the agreement, they orally agreed that Lennon could use Rogers’ computer. After executing the agreement, Rogers and Lennon orally agreed that Lennon would report on a monthly, rather than weekly, basis. The parties now disagree on Lennon’s right to use Rogers’ computer and how often Lennon must report to Rogers. ln the event of a lawsuit between the parties, the parol evidence rule will:
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.